Home
Contact - About us
NC Blog - Posts
More Extensive Discussions
Reviews
Heaven on Earth?
   
 


We would be pleased to hear from you!  We are a bit antiquated still - though we have made great strides lately.  You can still copy the email address below into your email service provider in order to contact us or to post a comment, but the Email Form below is easier.

You can reach us for comments and questions at:  contact@naturalchristian.org
For other business you can reach us at:  admin@naturalchristian.org



Copyright 2010 Greg Baenziger

In brief, Natural Christian beliefs were first established for myself in the 1980's and had been developed from a composite of religious views from numerous sources including standard Methodist teachings, study of philosophies such as existentialism and transcendentalism, Quaker beliefs, Unitarianism, and my own personal beliefs.

As founder of the Natural Christians I am providing some background information to help provide some understanding of how the ideas for Natural Christianity developed.  I am also the administrator for the web site and can be contacted through admin@naturalchristian.org.

I was raised a Methodist, but had many problems with conventional Christian beliefs.  There seemed to be many contradictions between the various Christian religions and I suffered from all the doubts of the many incongruous and illogical assertions made to aggrandize the religion and make it greater than life.  It was obvious to me that the religious beliefs of the Christian religions could not ALL be correct, not to mention the beliefs of the non-Christian religions.  Accepting any religion appeared to be purely personal choice or an inheritance of some choice made by others.

I strongly believed in some of the most important teachings of Jesus Christ, especially those that avoid violence and emphasize love and devotion, such as, love thy neighbor as you would thyself, turn the other cheek, do unto to others as you would have them do unto you, thou shall not kill, and many others - including the emphasis that devotion to God and the avoidance of evil are critical to finding a path through life.  I felt very strongly about these ideals and opted for Conscientious Objector status when I came of age for military service.  It was at this time that I learned of Quaker beliefs.  The Quakers provided advice and support in my attempts to avoid being forced to kill anybody or to avoid supporting others in killing people.  I was opposed to war and will always be opposed to war.  I still believe that if I was to belong to any religious group, it would be the Quaker Society of Friends.  Their religious behavior seems to me to be the most honest and devoted approach to Christian beliefs, behaving and living as Jesus would have chosen.   

I soon decided that if I were to be honest with myself, however, my beliefs were my own and did not fit exactly any religion that I knew of.  I also decided that my beliefs were religious in nature and not just philosophies, even though the distinction is subtle, perhaps based only on the level of conviction, thinking of them as a way of life, and the use of the term God, which I really did not understand at the time.  I also decided that I should hold tightly to my beliefs and exercise them, as honestly and devoutly as I was able.  Somewhere in the 1980's I had come up with the idea that I should formalize my beliefs and I started thinking about what that would mean.  It was important for me to know how I would discuss my unusual approach to religion, in discussions with friends and family.  I also decided that it was necessary for me to come up with a name for my religion.  My background in reading and philosophy had introduced the ideals of existentialism and transcendentalism, which I found to be more real than many religions.  I wanted to merge my devotion for the teachings of Jesus Christ and distaste for violence with the more philosophical ideals.  This step required me to think hard about my beliefs and the teachings attributed to Jesus Christ juxtaposed with the contradictions and seemingly irresolvable problems, which seem to be inherent in many religions.  These issues are normally dealt with by requiring the believer to have faith in God, the conceptualization of God promoted, or perhaps more accurately to have faith in the religious institution promoting the ideas.  My love of the outdoors, animals and nature, combined with the naturalism inherent in transcendentalism, provided the "Natural" modifier to the "Christian" beliefs.  By this time I had also resolved the criteria that my religion could not include any beliefs that I could not believe to be true.  Each of us must not bear false witness by promoting falsehoods or by accepting ideas that we do not believe.  That is, I would study and come to understand the belief and accept it, or I would reject the belief.  

Once I decided to formalize my beliefs as a religion and after I had made several key decisions, my new Natural Christian religion really began to develop in my own mind.  I began to take a hard look at each of the teachings of Jesus and the ideals of transcendentalism from my own experience and the new perspective.  My understanding of religion in general and my selection of beliefs were growing quickly with my own study and thinking and it was in this period that I began to think of religion as personal.  The key decisions were:  first, to make the religion personal and to suggest that others do the same; second, to center the fundamental beliefs around the peaceful teachings of Jesus Christ; third, to accumulate only ideas that I could believe whole-heartedly; and fourth, to resolve the various religious historical beliefs, to the best of my ability, to find the combination of beliefs that best fit with reality.  I could see that depending on the perspective, the words that Jesus spoke meant different things.  One movie production in particular, "Jesus of Nazareth" seemed to present Jesus as speaking in terms of a state of mental consciousness and devotion in the attainment of the Kingdom of Heaven.  I liked this perspective.  It seemed to suggest that Jesus had an understanding almost like the Buddhist approach to Nirvana, suggesting a heaven on earth through devotion and striving to control and improve oneself.  The most important development that made all the remaining beliefs follow logically was the conclusion that there was a way in which all Christian beliefs could be understandable and real without so much as a mention of faith.  This was of course that God was not external, but rather internal to everyone.  The more I thought of this pervasive embodiment of God, the more I found that I understood the religious teachings.  I believe the transformation was important to achieve a basic understanding that allows the teachings and traditions of many religions to make sense without the reliance on faith and without ignoring incongruities.  The change in perspective would be all that was required to see everything in a new light.

After developing what I consider my own personal religion, I must also admit that many others have come along similar paths before me.  There are many similarities in what I believe to various groups, especially transcendentalists, Quakers, pantheists and stoicists.  I intentionally select from each religion just what I like from their beliefs and so I am duplicating their beliefs.  For instance, by studying the history and the branching of the Quaker Friends societies, many beliefs are similar to my own, from a particular perspective.   Looking for God’s voice within oneself and each individual having the ability to find God or find the path of Jesus are two key elements of my own beliefs.  In thinking about what I believe and studying other religious views, I have become very religious in my own beliefs and have learned the importance of religious study, for every individual being, to find and to follow a path of goodness through life. 

I whole-heartedly recommend that each person who reads the materials on this web site consider doing what I have done and choose not to accept any traditional religious beliefs, including those presented here, without considering each aspect of those beliefs very carefully and resolving what they believe before accepting the beliefs of others.  I would appreciate hearing about your experiences and choices that you have made along these lines.  Please, see our contact page.

Greg Baenziger (GP)